Flagrantly deceiving viewers in a smear on Texas Congressman Ron Paul.
The Super Bowl Sunday, Bill O'Reilly asked Obama what he and the rest of Channel (or "FNC", as O'Reilly likes to call it) could do better. "Just give the American people the facts," Obama (or should I say, squeezed between interruptions). Given that O'Reilly likes to refer to their program as "the area of prohibition of turn", which seems to work should have presented much of a challenge.
However, presents a monstrous challenge, because regularly handles your information with half-truths and lies straight-up. Most of these partisan differences are philosophical raked over the coals to each side tautological bottom of the article only feel "right", as its input. But now, , stuck in a display unquestionable, visual deception, has irrefutable (and 'irrefudiatable') evidence of his lies to be dragged all over the web, liked, Twitter, and return to Twitter.
TX Rep. Ron Paul won the CPAC "polling" for 2012 presidential favorite for the second consecutive year in 2011. In 2010, Ron Paul supporters blocking the entrance of the hall announced in the CPAC, as it had been occupied by Mitt Romney supporters. In 2010, when Ron Paul wins announced, Romney supporters booed loudly. In 2011, however, when Paul wins announced, the audience applauded and cheered loudly.
Last night, organized Ron Paul to discuss his second victory at the CPAC. But in the broadcast images of CPAC, changed the tape, playing in place of images of 2010 with the name Paul received boos. Bill Hemmer then asked Paul: "Who was in the audience booing you? Did you get an ID on those people?"
In fact, the only boos were Paul was not Paul's boos boos than they produce. Why do this? Because favors a certain type of lifestyle right conservative candidates and Ron Paul does not fit the bill.
Recently a former employee of the headlines by calling the network "a propaganda team." This journalistic deception is likely to be referred. Ironically, the "propaganda" is the exact term that FNC cronies like Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck regularly wield in reference to his political opponents-liberal "extremists" such as NBC, or, God forbid Al Jazeera, which are basically, all dedicated jihadists in the eyes of Fox
Smear against Ron Paul goes to show how far the network is going to attack its own ostensible allies-Paul is a Republican and a fiscal conservative, after all, in defense of their candidates elected. But given how blatant this distortion, it also raises the question of how often is dedicated to this type of blatant deception. For every time that the network gets caught lying to distort reality, there are more chances of countless violations that slip under the radar, and in the wake unaware of Fox's viewers
Fox is still regarded as a legitimate news network is scary, especially with the 2012 presidential election looms closer each day.
